Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Brazil
60.4%
in 2022
Sri Lanka
57.5%
in 2019
Brazil rank
11th
Sri Lanka rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Brazil
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 60.4% against 57.5% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 11th and Sri Lanka ranks 14th of 34 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.2% | 54.0% | 14.2% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 64.2% | 54.5% | 9.7% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
- Brazil, at 60.4% against 57.5% in Sri Lanka as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 2.9%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Brazil ranks 11th and Sri Lanka ranks 14th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group