Armenia vs Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Armenia
57.9%
in 2022
Brazil
60.4%
in 2022
Armenia rank
13th
Brazil rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Armenia
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 60.4% against 57.9% in Armenia, a difference of 2.5%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Armenia ranks 13th and Brazil ranks 11th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.6% | 71.5% | 22.9% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 57.6% | 64.5% | 6.9% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 59.1% | 56.3% | 2.8% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Armenia or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 60.4% against 57.9% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Armenia and Brazil?
- 2.5%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Brazil?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Brazil rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Armenia ranks 13th and Brazil ranks 11th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group