Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Ecuador
64.0%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
56.5%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 64.0% against 56.5% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 7.5%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.3% | 57.8% | 23.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 79.3% | 56.5% | 22.8% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ecuador, at 64.0% against 56.5% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 7.5%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Ecuador ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group