Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Costa Rica
53.5%
in 2022
Mongolia
50.5%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
17th
Mongolia rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 53.5% against 50.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 30 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 49.7% | 48.6% | 1.2% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 55.3% | 50.5% | 4.8% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Costa Rica, at 53.5% against 50.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 3.0%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Costa Rica ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group