Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Costa Rica
53.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
56.5%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
17th
Kyrgyzstan rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 56.5% against 53.5% in Costa Rica, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 30 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 53.1% | 57.8% | 4.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 55.3% | 56.5% | 1.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 56.5% against 53.5% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Costa Rica ranks 17th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 15th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group