Chile vs Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Chile
55.5%
in 2022
Costa Rica
53.5%
in 2022
Chile rank
16th
Costa Rica rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Chile
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Chile currently reports 55.5% against 53.5% in Costa Rica, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Chile ranks 16th and Costa Rica ranks 17th of 30 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 39.9% | 54.1% | 14.2% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 43.6% | 54.4% | 10.8% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Chile or Costa Rica?
- Chile, at 55.5% against 53.5% in Costa Rica as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Chile and Costa Rica?
- 2.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Chile ranks 16th and Costa Rica ranks 17th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group