Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Brazil
71.2%
in 2022
Sri Lanka
71.3%
in 2019
Brazil rank
9th
Sri Lanka rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Brazil
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 71.3% against 71.2% in Brazil, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 9th and Sri Lanka ranks 8th of 30 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.3% | 56.5% | 7.9% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 74.1% | 64.5% | 9.7% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 71.3% against 71.2% in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Brazil ranks 9th and Sri Lanka ranks 8th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group