Brazil vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Brazil
71.2%
in 2022
Serbia
81.9%
in 2022
Brazil rank
9th
Serbia rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 81.9% against 71.2% in Brazil, a difference of 10.7%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Serbia ahead.
Brazil ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 6th of 30 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 70.8% | 71.4% | 0.6% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 70.8% | 80.4% | 9.7% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Brazil or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 81.9% against 71.2% in Brazil as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Brazil and Serbia?
- 10.7%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Brazil ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 6th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group