Armenia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Armenia
46.5%
in 2022
Mongolia
50.5%
in 2020
Armenia rank
20th
Mongolia rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Armenia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 50.5% against 46.5% in Armenia, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Armenia ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 30 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.2% | 48.3% | 3.1% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 56.6% | 48.6% | 8.0% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 52.9% | 50.5% | 2.4% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Armenia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 50.5% against 46.5% in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Armenia and Mongolia?
- 4.0%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Armenia ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group