Armenia vs Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Armenia
46.5%
in 2022
Kazakhstan
48.2%
in 2021
Armenia rank
20th
Kazakhstan rank
19th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Armenia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 48.2% against 46.5% in Armenia, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 20th and Kazakhstan ranks 19th of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 54.7% | 38.4% | 16.3% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 49.8% | 52.0% | 2.2% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Armenia or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 48.2% against 46.5% in Armenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Armenia and Kazakhstan?
- 1.7%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kazakhstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Kazakhstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Armenia ranks 20th and Kazakhstan ranks 19th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group