Armenia vs Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Armenia
46.5%
in 2022
Costa Rica
53.5%
in 2022
Armenia rank
20th
Costa Rica rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Armenia
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 53.5% against 46.5% in Armenia, a difference of 7.0%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Armenia ranks 20th and Costa Rica ranks 17th of 30 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.7% | 56.0% | 15.3% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 56.0% | 52.4% | 3.6% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 48.7% | 53.5% | 4.8% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Armenia or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 53.5% against 46.5% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Armenia and Costa Rica?
- 7.0%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Costa Rica?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Costa Rica rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Armenia ranks 20th and Costa Rica ranks 17th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group