Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Mongolia
74.9%
in 2020
Viet Nam
78.7%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
15th
Viet Nam rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 78.7% against 74.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Mongolia ranks 15th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 34 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 65.3% | 85.8% | 20.4% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 74.9% | 78.7% | 3.8% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 78.7% against 74.9% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 3.8%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Mongolia ranks 15th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group