Dominican Republic vs Mexico: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Dominican Republic
43.9%
in 2021
Mexico
41.0%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
30th
Mexico rank
32nd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Dominican Republic
- Mexico
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 43.9% against 41.0% in Mexico, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 30th and Mexico ranks 32nd of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.9% | 55.0% | 2.9% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 49.5% | 63.9% | 14.5% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Dominican Republic or Mexico?
- Dominican Republic, at 43.9% against 41.0% in Mexico as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Dominican Republic and Mexico?
- 2.9%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Mexico?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Mexico rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Dominican Republic ranks 30th and Mexico ranks 32nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group