Chile vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Chile
55.3%
in 2022
Uruguay
60.1%
in 2022
Chile rank
22nd
Uruguay rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Chile
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 60.1% against 55.3% in Chile, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.7% | 56.7% | 3.0% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 42.5% | 74.2% | 31.7% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 46.5% | 60.8% | 14.3% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Chile or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 60.1% against 55.3% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Chile and Uruguay?
- 4.8%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Chile ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group