Chile vs Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Chile
55.3%
in 2022
Ecuador
56.2%
in 2022
Chile rank
22nd
Ecuador rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Chile
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 56.2% against 55.3% in Chile, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 22nd and Ecuador ranks 21st of 34 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 42.5% | 49.4% | 6.8% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 46.5% | 51.9% | 5.4% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Chile or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 56.2% against 55.3% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Chile and Ecuador?
- 0.9%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Chile ranks 22nd and Ecuador ranks 21st of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group