Armenia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Armenia
71.3%
in 2022
Uruguay
60.1%
in 2022
Armenia rank
17th
Uruguay rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Armenia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 71.3% against 60.1% in Uruguay, a difference of 11.2%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 17th and Uruguay ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.8% | 55.6% | 7.2% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 77.5% | 70.7% | 6.8% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 76.3% | 60.7% | 15.7% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Armenia or Uruguay?
- Armenia, at 71.3% against 60.1% in Uruguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Armenia and Uruguay?
- 11.2%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uruguay?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Armenia ranks 17th and Uruguay ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group