Armenia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Armenia
71.3%
in 2022
South Africa
73.7%
in 2021
Armenia rank
17th
South Africa rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Armenia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 73.7% against 71.3% in Armenia, a difference of 2.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Armenia ranks 17th and South Africa ranks 16th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 80.6% | 160.8% | 80.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 78.9% | 75.1% | 3.8% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Armenia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 73.7% against 71.3% in Armenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Armenia and South Africa?
- 2.4%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Armenia ranks 17th and South Africa ranks 16th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group