Armenia vs Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Armenia
71.3%
in 2022
Brazil
62.8%
in 2022
Armenia rank
17th
Brazil rank
19th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Armenia
- Brazil
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 71.3% against 62.8% in Brazil, a difference of 8.5%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Brazil ahead.
Armenia ranks 17th and Brazil ranks 19th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Brazil in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.4% | 75.6% | 7.2% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 78.8% | 70.1% | 8.7% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 76.3% | 59.1% | 17.3% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Armenia or Brazil?
- Armenia, at 71.3% against 62.8% in Brazil as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Armenia and Brazil?
- 8.5%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Brazil?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Brazil rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Armenia ranks 17th and Brazil ranks 19th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group