Dominican Republic vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Dominican Republic
39.3%
in 2021
Serbia
44.5%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
12th
Serbia rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Dominican Republic
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 44.5% against 39.3% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 5.2%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 12th and Serbia ranks 10th of 36 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.7% | 42.9% | 3.2% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 35.6% | 51.1% | 15.5% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 39.3% | 31.4% | 7.9% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Dominican Republic or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 44.5% against 39.3% in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 5.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Dominican Republic ranks 12th and Serbia ranks 10th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group