Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Costa Rica
34.8%
in 2022
Mongolia
29.8%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
15th
Mongolia rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 34.8% against 29.8% in Mongolia, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 36 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.8% | 19.5% | 11.3% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 35.1% | 29.8% | 5.3% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Costa Rica, at 34.8% against 29.8% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 5.0%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Costa Rica ranks 15th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group