Colombia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Colombia
29.0%
in 2022
Mongolia
29.8%
in 2020
Colombia rank
18th
Mongolia rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Colombia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 29.8% against 29.0% in Colombia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Colombia ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 36 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.4% | 19.5% | 4.8% | Colombia |
| 2020s | 399.1% | 29.8% | 369.3% | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Colombia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 29.8% against 29.0% in Colombia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Colombia and Mongolia?
- 0.8%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Colombia ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group