Armenia vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Armenia
78.4%
in 2022
Viet Nam
59.3%
in 2020
Armenia rank
2nd
Viet Nam rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Armenia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 78.4% against 59.3% in Viet Nam, a difference of 19.1%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.3 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 36 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 93.3% | 30.7% | 62.7% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 72.6% | 59.3% | 13.4% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Armenia or Viet Nam?
- Armenia, at 78.4% against 59.3% in Viet Nam as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Armenia and Viet Nam?
- 19.1%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group