Kyrgyzstan vs Thailand: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Kyrgyzstan
54.3%
in 2020
Thailand
47.0%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
5th
Thailand rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Thailand
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 54.3% against 47.0% in Thailand, a difference of 7.3%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Thailand's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and Thailand ranks 7th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.0% | 1.7% | 44.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 58.3% | 40.1% | 18.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Kyrgyzstan or Thailand?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 54.3% against 47.0% in Thailand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Kyrgyzstan and Thailand?
- 7.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Thailand rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 5th and Thailand ranks 7th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group