Honduras vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Honduras
33.1%
in 2019
Mongolia
33.2%
in 2020
Honduras rank
16th
Mongolia rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Honduras
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 33.2% against 33.1% in Honduras, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.2% | 15.6% | 15.6% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 40.9% | 21.8% | 19.1% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Honduras or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 33.2% against 33.1% in Honduras as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Honduras and Mongolia?
- 0.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Honduras and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Honduras ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group