El Salvador vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
El Salvador
23.5%
in 2022
Peru
23.7%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
25th
Peru rank
23rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- El Salvador
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 23.7% against 23.5% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 25th and Peru ranks 23rd of 36 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.7% | 18.9% | 22.8% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 36.7% | 19.1% | 17.5% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 21.9% | 24.0% | 2.2% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, El Salvador or Peru?
- Peru, at 23.7% against 23.5% in El Salvador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between El Salvador and Peru?
- 0.2%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- El Salvador ranks 25th and Peru ranks 23rd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group