Colombia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Colombia
28.6%
in 2022
Mongolia
33.2%
in 2020
Colombia rank
17th
Mongolia rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Colombia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 33.2% against 28.6% in Colombia, a difference of 4.6%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Colombia ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.3% | 20.8% | 2.6% | Colombia |
| 2020s | 399.6% | 33.2% | 366.4% | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Colombia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 33.2% against 28.6% in Colombia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Colombia and Mongolia?
- 4.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Colombia ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 15th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group