Chile vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Chile
23.6%
in 2022
Uruguay
20.9%
in 2022
Chile rank
24th
Uruguay rank
27th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Chile
- Uruguay
How they compare
Chile currently reports 23.6% against 20.9% in Uruguay, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uruguay ahead.
Chile ranks 24th and Uruguay ranks 27th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 32.3% | 37.8% | 5.5% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 21.6% | 21.3% | 0.3% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Chile or Uruguay?
- Chile, at 23.6% against 20.9% in Uruguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Chile and Uruguay?
- 2.7%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Chile ranks 24th and Uruguay ranks 27th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group