Armenia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Armenia
70.0%
in 2022
South Africa
60.0%
in 2021
Armenia rank
2nd
South Africa rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Armenia
- South Africa
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 70.0% against 60.0% in South Africa, a difference of 10.0%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 3rd of 36 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 105.9% | 74.7% | 31.2% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 71.8% | 61.1% | 10.7% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Armenia or South Africa?
- Armenia, at 70.0% against 60.0% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Armenia and South Africa?
- 10.0%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 3rd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group