Armenia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Armenia
70.0%
in 2022
Poland
13,618.6%
in 2019
Armenia rank
2nd
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 13,618.6% against 70.0% in Armenia, a difference of 13,548.6%.
That makes Poland's figure about 194.7 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 1st of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.0% | 19.3% | 53.6% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 109.8% | 1,963.1% | 1,853.2% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 13,618.6% against 70.0% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Armenia and Poland?
- 13,548.6%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 1st of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group