Armenia vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Armenia
86.8%
in 2022
Viet Nam
55.1%
in 2020
Armenia rank
2nd
Viet Nam rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Armenia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 86.8% against 55.1% in Viet Nam, a difference of 31.7%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.6 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 35 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 98.1% | 30.8% | 67.3% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 65.4% | 55.1% | 10.4% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Armenia or Viet Nam?
- Armenia, at 86.8% against 55.1% in Viet Nam as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Armenia and Viet Nam?
- 31.7%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 5th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group