El Salvador vs Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
El Salvador
24.4%
in 2022
Georgia
24.5%
in 2021
El Salvador rank
21st
Georgia rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- El Salvador
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 24.5% against 24.4% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Georgia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 21st and Georgia ranks 20th of 36 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 39.8% | 52.0% | 12.2% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 23.8% | 24.5% | 0.7% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, El Salvador or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 24.5% against 24.4% in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between El Salvador and Georgia?
- 0.1%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Georgia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Georgia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- El Salvador ranks 21st and Georgia ranks 20th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group