Chile vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Chile
21.7%
in 2022
Uruguay
19.6%
in 2022
Chile rank
26th
Uruguay rank
29th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Chile
- Uruguay
How they compare
Chile currently reports 21.7% against 19.6% in Uruguay, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uruguay ahead.
Chile ranks 26th and Uruguay ranks 29th of 36 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 29.9% | 35.1% | 5.2% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 19.9% | 20.1% | 0.2% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Chile or Uruguay?
- Chile, at 21.7% against 19.6% in Uruguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Chile and Uruguay?
- 2.1%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Chile ranks 26th and Uruguay ranks 29th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group