Belarus vs Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Belarus
10.3%
in 2019
Ecuador
12.7%
in 2022
Belarus rank
34th
Ecuador rank
33rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 12.7% against 10.3% in Belarus, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 33rd of 36 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.5% | 38.0% | 28.4% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 12.4% | 23.8% | 11.4% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 12.7% against 10.3% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 2.4%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 33rd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group