Armenia vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Armenia
69.2%
in 2022
Viet Nam
121.9%
in 2020
Armenia rank
3rd
Viet Nam rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Armenia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 121.9% against 69.2% in Armenia, a difference of 52.7%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.8 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 3rd and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 86.7% | 46.1% | 40.6% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 59.8% | 121.9% | 62.1% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Armenia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 121.9% against 69.2% in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Armenia and Viet Nam?
- 52.7%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Armenia ranks 3rd and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group