Armenia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Armenia
69.2%
in 2022
South Africa
58.1%
in 2021
Armenia rank
3rd
South Africa rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Armenia
- South Africa
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 69.2% against 58.1% in South Africa, a difference of 11.1%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 5th of 36 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 98.1% | 79.4% | 18.8% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 67.8% | 57.2% | 10.5% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Armenia or South Africa?
- Armenia, at 69.2% against 58.1% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Armenia and South Africa?
- 11.1%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Armenia ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 5th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group