Armenia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Armenia
69.2%
in 2022
Poland
10,063.7%
in 2019
Armenia rank
3rd
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 10,063.7% against 69.2% in Armenia, a difference of 9,994.5%.
That makes Poland's figure about 145.4 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 1st of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.7% | 14.7% | 56.0% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 104.7% | 1,450.4% | 1,345.7% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 10,063.7% against 69.2% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Armenia and Poland?
- 9,994.5%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Armenia ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 1st of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group