Slovenia vs Taiwan: Access to justice for men

Slovenia
1
in 2025
Taiwan
1
in 2025
Slovenia rank
1st
Taiwan rank
1st

Access to justice for men over time

  • Slovenia
  • Taiwan
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 1 against 1 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 217 shared years of data; in 1804 it was Slovenia ahead.

Slovenia ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 23 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Taiwan Difference Ahead
1800s 1 0 1 Slovenia
1810s 1 0 1 Slovenia
1820s 1 0 1 Slovenia
1830s 1 0 1 Slovenia
1840s 0.8 0 0.8 Slovenia
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0.3 0 0.3 Slovenia
1870s 1 0 1 Slovenia
1880s 1 0 1 Slovenia
1890s 1 0 1 Slovenia
1900s 1 0 1 Slovenia
1910s 0.9 0 0.9 Slovenia
1920s 0 0 0
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0.5 0 0.5 Slovenia
1970s 1 0 1 Slovenia
1980s 1 0.1 0.9 Slovenia
1990s 1 1 0
2000s 1 1 0
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher access to justice for men, Slovenia or Taiwan?
Slovenia, at 1 against 1 in Taiwan as of 2025.
What is the difference in access to justice for men between Slovenia and Taiwan?
0, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Taiwan?
217 years are reported by both, from 1804 to 2025.
How do Slovenia and Taiwan rank globally for access to justice for men?
Slovenia ranks 1st and Taiwan ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Access to justice for men. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Access to justice for men
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,494 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate whether men have access to justice.