Cuba vs Sri Lanka: Access to basic services, per unit of GDP
Cuba
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Sri Lanka
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cuba rank
135th
Sri Lanka rank
133rd
Access to basic services, per unit of GDP over time
- Cuba
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Cuba ranks 135th and Sri Lanka ranks 133rd of 210 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher access to basic services, per unit of gdp, Cuba or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in access to basic services, per unit of gdp between Cuba and Sri Lanka?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sri Lanka?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Sri Lanka rank globally for access to basic services, per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 135th and Sri Lanka ranks 133rd of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Access to basic services, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Access to basic services divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.