Madagascar vs Zimbabwe: 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks
Madagascar
1.33 billion
in 2025
Zimbabwe
1.33 billion
in 2025
Madagascar rank
146th
Zimbabwe rank
145th
27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks over time
- Madagascar
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1.33 billion against 1.33 billion in Madagascar, a difference of 3.86 million.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Madagascar ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 588.60 million | 814.00 million | 225.40 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 880.10 million | 856.90 million | 23.20 million | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 1.03 billion | 1.13 billion | 103.07 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1.20 billion | 1.37 billion | 162.98 million | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks, Madagascar or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1.33 billion against 1.33 billion in Madagascar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks between Madagascar and Zimbabwe?
- 3.86 million, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Zimbabwe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Madagascar and Zimbabwe rank globally for 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks?
- Madagascar ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BIS, published as 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data are derived from the BIS locational banking statistics. Deposits with BIS reporting banks are shown in BIS publications as banks' liabilities to their creditors.