Hungary vs Samoa: 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks

Hungary
23.31 billion
in 2025
Samoa
24.11 billion
in 2025
Hungary rank
62nd
Samoa rank
60th

27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks over time

  • Hungary
  • Samoa
010.0B20.0B30.0B199520102025

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 24.11 billion against 23.31 billion in Hungary, a difference of 802.20 million.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 62nd and Samoa ranks 60th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 3 and Samoa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Samoa Difference Ahead
1990s 3.12 billion 36.00 million 3.08 billion Hungary
2000s 7.75 billion 2.39 billion 5.36 billion Hungary
2010s 14.59 billion 13.17 billion 1.42 billion Hungary
2020s 21.19 billion 22.24 billion 1.06 billion Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks, Hungary or Samoa?
Samoa, at 24.11 billion against 23.31 billion in Hungary as of 2025.
What is the difference in 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks between Hungary and Samoa?
802.20 million, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Samoa?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Hungary and Samoa rank globally for 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks?
Hungary ranks 62nd and Samoa ranks 60th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BIS, published as 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks
Source
BIS
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,312 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed

The data are derived from the BIS locational banking statistics. Deposits with BIS reporting banks are shown in BIS publications as banks' liabilities to their creditors.