Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks
Eswatini
1.24 billion
in 2025
Zimbabwe
1.33 billion
in 2025
Eswatini rank
148th
Zimbabwe rank
145th
27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks over time
- Eswatini
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1.33 billion against 1.24 billion in Eswatini, a difference of 87.50 million.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 208 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 185.00 million | 814.00 million | 629.00 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 354.20 million | 856.90 million | 502.70 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 822.80 million | 1.13 billion | 305.40 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1.05 billion | 1.37 billion | 319.60 million | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks, Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1.33 billion against 1.24 billion in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 87.50 million, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks?
- Eswatini ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BIS, published as 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data are derived from the BIS locational banking statistics. Deposits with BIS reporting banks are shown in BIS publications as banks' liabilities to their creditors.