What is the difference in 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?

6.48 million, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?

31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

BIS, published as 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks

Equatorial Guinea

98.04 million

in 2025

Sao Tome and Principe

104.52 million

in 2025

Equatorial Guinea rank

198th

Sao Tome and Principe rank

196th

27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks over time

Equatorial Guinea
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 104.52 million against 98.04 million in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 6.48 million.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 198th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 196th of 209 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Sao Tome and Principe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	29.20 million	8.00 million	21.20 million	Equatorial Guinea
2000s	317.10 million	37.00 million	280.10 million	Equatorial Guinea
2010s	1.40 billion	71.23 million	1.33 billion	Equatorial Guinea
2020s	196.48 million	97.29 million	99.18 million	Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?: Sao Tome and Principe, at 104.52 million against 98.04 million in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?: 6.48 million, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 198th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 196th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?: BIS, published as 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks. Statizoid, drawing on BIS. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/27-cross-border-deposits-with-bis-rep-banks/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/27-cross-border-deposits-with-bis-rep-banks/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks
Source: BIS
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 209 places, 6,312 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The data are derived from the BIS locational banking statistics. Deposits with BIS reporting banks are shown in BIS publications as banks' liabilities to their creditors.