Congo vs New Caledonia: 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks

Congo
1.61 billion
in 2025
New Caledonia
1.57 billion
in 2025
Congo rank
139th
New Caledonia rank
140th

27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks over time

  • Congo
  • New Caledonia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199520102025

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1.61 billion against 1.57 billion in New Caledonia, a difference of 36.39 million.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 139th and New Caledonia ranks 140th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 267.60 million 77.80 million 189.80 million Congo
2000s 489.30 million 525.90 million 36.60 million New Caledonia
2010s 1.25 billion 1.44 billion 191.13 million New Caledonia
2020s 1.54 billion 1.33 billion 210.34 million Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks, Congo or New Caledonia?
Congo, at 1.61 billion against 1.57 billion in New Caledonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks between Congo and New Caledonia?
36.39 million, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and New Caledonia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Congo and New Caledonia rank globally for 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks?
Congo ranks 139th and New Caledonia ranks 140th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BIS, published as 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks
Source
BIS
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,312 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed

The data are derived from the BIS locational banking statistics. Deposits with BIS reporting banks are shown in BIS publications as banks' liabilities to their creditors.