Chile vs Egypt: 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks

Chile
26.53 billion
in 2025
Egypt
30.81 billion
in 2025
Chile rank
57th
Egypt rank
54th

27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks over time

  • Chile
  • Egypt
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B199520102025

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 30.81 billion against 26.53 billion in Chile, a difference of 4.28 billion.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Egypt ahead.

Chile ranks 57th and Egypt ranks 54th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Egypt in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Egypt Difference Ahead
1990s 12.84 billion 24.05 billion 11.21 billion Egypt
2000s 18.04 billion 28.11 billion 10.06 billion Egypt
2010s 25.36 billion 24.89 billion 466.34 million Chile
2020s 30.35 billion 26.09 billion 4.26 billion Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks, Chile or Egypt?
Egypt, at 30.81 billion against 26.53 billion in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks between Chile and Egypt?
4.28 billion, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Egypt?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Chile and Egypt rank globally for 27_cross-border deposits with bis rep. banks?
Chile ranks 57th and Egypt ranks 54th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BIS, published as 27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks
Source
BIS
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,312 data points, 1995–2025
Last refreshed

The data are derived from the BIS locational banking statistics. Deposits with BIS reporting banks are shown in BIS publications as banks' liabilities to their creditors.