South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: 24_International reserves (excluding gold), per square kilometre

South Sudan
167.68 excluding gold per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
439.27 excluding gold per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan rank
173rd
Zimbabwe rank
171st

24_International reserves (excluding gold), per square kilometre over time

  • South Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 439.27 excluding gold per square kilometre against 167.68 excluding gold per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 271.59 excluding gold per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.6 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.

South Sudan ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 171st of 174 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 640.85 excluding gold per square kilometre 889.41 excluding gold per square kilometre 248.55 excluding gold per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 287.81 excluding gold per square kilometre 743.33 excluding gold per square kilometre 455.52 excluding gold per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 24_international reserves (excluding gold), per square kilometre, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 439.27 excluding gold per square kilometre against 167.68 excluding gold per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in 24_international reserves (excluding gold), per square kilometre between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
271.59 excluding gold per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for 24_international reserves (excluding gold), per square kilometre?
South Sudan ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 171st of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 24_International reserves (excluding gold), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: 24_International reserves (excluding gold), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/24-international-reserves-excluding-gold-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/24-international-reserves-excluding-gold-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/zimbabwe/">South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: 24_International reserves (excluding gold), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
24_International reserves (excluding gold), per square kilometre
Unit
excluding gold per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 5,637 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

24_International reserves (excluding gold) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.