Equatorial Guinea vs Nepal: 23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total, per capita

Equatorial Guinea
21.82 units per person
in 2025
Nepal
22.13 units per person
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
177th
Nepal rank
176th

23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total, per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Nepal
050100150200250199020072025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 22.13 units per person against 21.82 units per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.31 units per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 177th and Nepal ranks 176th of 208 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 29.43 units per person 2.33 units per person 27.1 units per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 50.8 units per person 2.84 units per person 47.96 units per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 91.37 units per person 7.17 units per person 84.19 units per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 44.97 units per person 20.77 units per person 24.2 units per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 23_liabilities to bis banks, consolidated, total, per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Nepal?
Nepal, at 22.13 units per person against 21.82 units per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in 23_liabilities to bis banks, consolidated, total, per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Nepal?
0.31 units per person, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nepal?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Nepal rank globally for 23_liabilities to bis banks, consolidated, total, per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 177th and Nepal ranks 176th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Nepal: 23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/23-liabilities-to-bis-banks-consolidated-total-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/23-liabilities-to-bis-banks-consolidated-total-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/nepal/">Equatorial Guinea vs Nepal: 23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 7,036 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.