Ecuador vs South Africa: 23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total, per capita

Ecuador
392.37 units per person
in 2025
South Africa
394.31 units per person
in 2025
Ecuador rank
117th
South Africa rank
116th

23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total, per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
200400600800199020072025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 394.31 units per person against 392.37 units per person in Ecuador, a difference of 1.94 units per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 117th and South Africa ranks 116th of 208 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 278.3 units per person 361.72 units per person 83.42 units per person South Africa
2000s 150.04 units per person 454.64 units per person 304.6 units per person South Africa
2010s 295.84 units per person 656.05 units per person 360.21 units per person South Africa
2020s 399.72 units per person 458.28 units per person 58.55 units per person South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 23_liabilities to bis banks, consolidated, total, per capita, Ecuador or South Africa?
South Africa, at 394.31 units per person against 392.37 units per person in Ecuador as of 2025.
What is the difference in 23_liabilities to bis banks, consolidated, total, per capita between Ecuador and South Africa?
1.94 units per person, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for 23_liabilities to bis banks, consolidated, total, per capita?
Ecuador ranks 117th and South Africa ranks 116th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: 23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/23-liabilities-to-bis-banks-consolidated-total-per-capita/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/23-liabilities-to-bis-banks-consolidated-total-per-capita/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: 23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 7,036 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.