How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malaysia?

33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as 22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Malaysia: 22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per unit of GDP

Chile

0.1995 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Malaysia

0.1912 units per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Chile rank

69th

Malaysia rank

71st

22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per unit of GDP over time

Chile
Malaysia

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.1995 units per US$ of GDP against 0.1912 units per US$ of GDP in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0083 units per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Malaysia ahead.

Chile ranks 69th and Malaysia ranks 71st of 204 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Malaysia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.2049 units per US$ of GDP	0.2559 units per US$ of GDP	0.051 units per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
2000s	0.2178 units per US$ of GDP	0.2184 units per US$ of GDP	0.0005 units per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
2010s	0.1933 units per US$ of GDP	0.2059 units per US$ of GDP	0.0125 units per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
2020s	0.2075 units per US$ of GDP	0.2198 units per US$ of GDP	0.0123 units per US$ of GDP	Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 22_liabilities to bis banks, locational, total, per unit of gdp, Chile or Malaysia?: Chile, at 0.1995 units per US$ of GDP against 0.1912 units per US$ of GDP in Malaysia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 22_liabilities to bis banks, locational, total, per unit of gdp between Chile and Malaysia?: 0.0083 units per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malaysia?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Chile and Malaysia rank globally for 22_liabilities to bis banks, locational, total, per unit of gdp?: Chile ranks 69th and Malaysia ranks 71st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as 22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Malaysia: 22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/22-liabilities-to-bis-banks-locational-total-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/22-liabilities-to-bis-banks-locational-total-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/malaysia/">Chile vs Malaysia: 22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: 22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per unit of GDP
Unit: units per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 204 places, 6,506 data points, 1993–2025
Last refreshed: 19 September 2026

22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.