South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: 22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per capita
South Sudan
21.67 units per person
in 2025
Zimbabwe
22.2 units per person
in 2025
South Sudan rank
192nd
Zimbabwe rank
191st
22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per capita over time
- South Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 22.2 units per person against 21.67 units per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0.53 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
South Sudan ranks 192nd and Zimbabwe ranks 191st of 208 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.49 units per person | 32.75 units per person | 31.26 units per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 14.87 units per person | 18.52 units per person | 3.65 units per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 22_liabilities to bis banks, locational, total, per capita, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 22.2 units per person against 21.67 units per person in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 22_liabilities to bis banks, locational, total, per capita between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 0.53 units per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for 22_liabilities to bis banks, locational, total, per capita?
- South Sudan ranks 192nd and Zimbabwe ranks 191st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.