Angola vs Monaco: 22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per capita
Angola
652.21 units per person
in 2025
Monaco
623.89 units per person
in 2006
Angola rank
108th
Monaco rank
110th
22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per capita over time
- Angola
- Monaco
How they compare
Angola currently reports 652.21 units per person against 623.89 units per person in Monaco, a difference of 28.32 units per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 108th and Monaco ranks 110th of 208 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Monaco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 138.01 units per person | 0 units per person | 138.01 units per person | Angola |
| 2000s | 133.37 units per person | 257.3 units per person | 123.93 units per person | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 22_liabilities to bis banks, locational, total, per capita, Angola or Monaco?
- Angola, at 652.21 units per person against 623.89 units per person in Monaco as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 22_liabilities to bis banks, locational, total, per capita between Angola and Monaco?
- 28.32 units per person, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Monaco?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2006.
- How do Angola and Monaco rank globally for 22_liabilities to bis banks, locational, total, per capita?
- Angola ranks 108th and Monaco ranks 110th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.